Senthil Kumar, N (2008) Comparative study of Merits and Demerits of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Open Cholecystectomy. Masters thesis, Madras Medical College, Chennai.
|
Text
200100108senthilkumar.pdf Download (6MB) | Preview |
Abstract
CONCLUSION: In my study I conc1ude that Laparascopic cholecystectomy is advantage over open cho1ecystectomy for fo11owing reasons associated with Laparoscopic group. a) Ear1ier return of Bowel activity, b) Lesser postoperative pain and Analgesic requirement, c) Shorter hospital stay, d) Earlier return to work, e) Cosmetic superiority, J) Cost effectiveness, g) Lesser complication rate. With re1ative increase in Operative time was observed in 1aµaroscoµic group due to 1earning curve of junior residence. Conversion rate in our study is simi1ar to other studies.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ; Open Cholecystectomy ; Merits and Demerits ; Comparative study. |
| Subjects: | MEDICAL > General Medicine |
| Depositing User: | Subramani R |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Mar 2018 04:05 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Mar 2018 17:40 |
| URI: | http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/id/eprint/6670 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
