Comparison of Gait with Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) in patients following Stroke

Gourav Sannyasi, (2019) Comparison of Gait with Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) in patients following Stroke. Masters thesis, Christian Medical College, Vellore.

[img]
Preview
Text
201901119gourav_sannyasi.pdf

Download (2MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
201901119gourav_sannyasi_abstract.pdf

Download (106kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation (FES) as an effective alternative to ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO) for treatment of foot-drop post-stroke, but no conclusive evidence to suggest that FES is superior to AFO for correction of foot drop (Hemiplegic foot). AIM OF THE STUDY: To determine whether FES has any added benefits as compared to ankle foot orthosis (AFO) in post stroke patients, by measuring gait parameters. OBJECTIVES: 1. To compare spatiotemporal parameters between AFO and FES. 2. To evaluate ankle-foot kinematics in patient with stroke. METHOD: The study was a non-randomized cross over trial. Twenty patients with history of cerebrovascular accidents, of at least 3 months duration, were enrolled. Patients were divided in two groups (group A and B) consisting of 10 patients in each group. Patients of group A were trained with Ankle-Foot-Orthosis (AFO) followed by Functional electrical stimulation (FES). Patients of group B were trained first with Functional electrical stimulation (FES) followed by Ankle-Foot-Orthosis (AFO). Primary outcomes - 10 meter walk test, 6 minute walk test, physiological cost index. Secondary outcomes - step length, stride length, stance-swing ratio, single limb support, timed up and go test, Ankle kinematics, feedback for satisfaction level. RESULTS: Peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation (FES) improved the walking speed (p value-0.0001) and endurance (Six minute walk test, p value-0.004) in both the groups when compared to ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO). Physiological cost index (PCI) was reduced with both AFO and FES as compared to baseline, however there was no statistical difference between AFO and FES. (p value- 0.46). CONCLUSION: FES has positive orthotic effect on walking speed and endurance. FES was found to be effective to minimize ankle plantar-flexion during swing phase thus helps to restore normal ankle kinematics. Satisfaction level was higher with FES users.

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Additional Information: Reg.No.201629052
Uncontrolled Keywords: Gait, Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO), Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), stroke.
Subjects: MEDICAL > Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Depositing User: Subramani R
Date Deposited: 19 Aug 2019 01:01
Last Modified: 19 Aug 2019 01:01
URI: http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/id/eprint/10954

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item